Answer to the question of 2008 (November)

District- Dhaka

                 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH

                            HIGH COURT DIVISION

                   (CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

               Memorandum of Appeal from Original Decree

              First Appeal Tender No.    of 2008

                                  First Appeal No.             of 2008                     

                                                                                           

                                   IN THE MATTER OF :

                                    Hossain

                                    Son of      

                                    Of,…..

                                    Vill-

                                    P.S.-

                                             …………………Plaintiff-Appellant

                                                      Versus

                                     Kabir

                                     Son of,

                                     Of,

                                     Vill-

                                     P.S.- 

                                             ……………Defendant-Respondent

                                    Suit Valued at      Tk. 3200000 

                                    Appeal Valued at Tk. 3200000

                                                        

                                          Being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated

                                   10.7.2008 passed by the 1^st Court of Joint District 

                                   Judge, Dhaka in Title Suit No.329 of 2008 rejecting 

                                   the plaint of the said suit, the plaintiffs-appellant 

                                   begs to prefer this Memorandum  of Appeal on the 

                                   following amongst other,

                                                  Grounds

      I.            For that the impugned judgment and decree is bad in facts and law as 

        well.

   II.            For that the learned Joint District Judge erred in law dismissing the suit.

III.            For that the learned Joint District Judge acted on his own surmise and 

        conjecture decreeing the suit in not considering the issues involved in 

        the suit.

 IV.           For that the learned Joint District Judge failed to appreciate, assess the facts and circumstances of the case, materials on record in accordance with law.

  V.            For that the lower appellate Court had traveled beyond its jurisdiction by dismissing the suit and as such judgment and order passed by the Trial Court is wholly illegal, malafide and unsustainable in the eye of law.

VI.            For that the learned Joint District Judge without considering the facts 

        and circumstances of the suit, exhibits and evidences on record on his 

        own assumption found that the plaintiff could not prove the possession 

        on the suit land and thereby committed miscarriage of justice in 

        decreeing the suit not tenable in law.   

                                                                         

VII.         For that considering the facts and circumstances of the suit and 

        materials on record the learned Joint District Judge ought to have 

        decreed the suit on plaintiff’s favor.

VIII.     For that the learned Joint District Judge erroneously found that the

        defendants claim is appropriate as he was enjoying the land for a long  

        time. 

IX.       For that the Learned Joint District Judge most illegally and arbitrarily gave stress upon the claim of the defendant overlooking the facts and circumstances of the case and materials on record.

  X.     For that the learned Joint District Judge illegally based his findings in favor of the defendant in deciding the suit, based on assumption, contrary to the materials on record.

XI.    For that the Learned Joint District Judge failed to consider that the plaintiff succeeded to prove the case in accordance with law and hence the impugned Judgment and Decree is not tenable in law.

                                                     CERTIFICATE

I have gone the records of the suit and found good grounds of appeal and having prepared them I undertake to support them at the time of hearing.

                                                                                           

                                                                   Advocate

 List of papers :          

                                     

1. Memo of Appeal     -           1   copy

                             

2. Judgment and Decree -       1    copy

3. Vokalatnama             -       1    copy

4. Second Judge’s Copy-          1    copy    

                           Total   -     4  copies