Answer of the question of 2010-


Same as the 2011 answer. Just change the parties name.



Answer of the question of 2009-

District- Dhaka

      IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH

     HIGH COURT DIVISION

      (CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

                                    Memorandum of Appeal from Original Decree

                   First Appeal Tender No..........2008

                                         First Appeal No.                  of 2008                     

                                                                                            

                                                    IN THE MATTER OF :

       

    Hossain

                                                    Son of      

                                                    Of,…..

                                                    Vill-

                                                    P.S.-

                                                                  …………………Plaintiff-Appellant

                                                                          Versus

                                                    Kabir

                                                    Son of,

                                                    Of,

                                                    Vill-

                                                    P.S.-  

                                                                 ……………Defendant-Respondent

                                                  Suit Valued at      Tk. 3200000 

                                                  Appeal Valued at Tk. 3200000

                                                 Being aggrieved by the judgment and decree

                                                 dated 10.7.2008 passed by the 1^st Court of 

                                                 Joint District Judge, Dhaka in Title Suit No.329 of   

                                                  2008 rejecting the plaint of the said suit, the 

                                                  plaintiffs-appellant begs to prefer this  

                                                 Memorandum  of Appeal on the following amongst 

                                                  other,

                                                          Grounds

    I.        For that the impugned judgment and decree is bad in facts and law as

       well.

  II.       For that the learned Joint District Judge erred in law dismissing the

        suit.

III.       For that the learned Joint District Judge acted on his own surmise and

        conjecture decreeing the suit in not considering the issues involved in

        the suit.

 IV.    For that the learned Joint District Judge failed to appreciate, assess

       the facts and circumstances of the case, materials on record in

       accordance with law.

   V.      For that the lower appellate Court had traveled beyond its jurisdiction 

       by dismissing the suit and as such judgment and order passed by the 

       Trial Court is wholly illegal, malafide and unsustainable in the eye of 

        law.

 VI.      For that the learned Joint District Judge without considering the facts

       and circumstances of the suit, exhibits and evidences on record on his

      own assumption found that the plaintiff could not prove the possession

      on the suit land and thereby committed miscarriage of justice in

      decreeing the suit not tenable in law.                                                                             

VII.      For that considering the facts and circumstances of the suit and

        materials on record the learned Joint District Judge ought to have

        decreed the suit on plaintiff’s favour.

VIII.     For that the learned Joint District Judge erroneously found that the

       defendants claim is appropriate as he was enjoying the land for a long

         time. 

 IX.       For that the Learned Joint District Judge most illegally and arbitrarily

        gave stress upon the claim of the defendant overlooking the facts and

        circumstances of the case and materials on record.

   X.        For that the learned Joint District Judge illegally based his findings in 

        favor of the defendant in deciding the suit, based on assumption,

        contrary to the materials on record.

 XI.        For that the Learned Joint District Judge failed to consider that the

      plaintiff succeeded to prove the case in accordance with law and hence

        the impugned Judgment and Decree is not tenable in law.

                                                                              CERTIFICATE

                                                     I have gone the records of the suit and found 

                                                     good grounds of appeal and having prepared 

                                                    them I undertake to support them at the time of

                                                    hearing.

                                                                        


  
                                                                    Advocate

 List of papers :      

                                               

1. Memo of Appeal  -                     1   copy

                                   

2. Judgment and Decree -            1    copy

3. Vokalatnama                  -           1    copy

4. Second Judge’s Copy-               1    copy        

                               Total   -          4  copies